• News
  • Life
  • TV & Film
  • Beauty
  • Style
  • Home
  • News
    • Celebrity
    • Entertainment
    • Politics
    • Royal Family
  • Life
    • Animals
    • Food & Drink
    • Women's Health
    • Mental Health
    • Sex & Relationships
    • Travel
    • Real Life
  • TV & Film
    • True Crime
    • Documentaries
    • Netflix
    • BBC
    • ITV
    • Tyla Recommends
  • Beauty
    • Hair
    • Make-up
    • Skincare
  • Style
    • Home
    • Fashion
    • Shopping
  • Advertise
  • Terms
  • Privacy & Cookies
  • LADbible Group
  • LADbible
  • UNILAD
  • SPORTbible
  • GAMINGbible
  • UNILAD Tech
  • FOODbible
  • License Our Content
  • About Us & Contact
  • Jobs
  • Latest
  • Topics A-Z
  • Authors
Facebook
Instagram
X
Threads
TikTok
Submit Your Content
Man sues hospital for $1billion claiming watching wife's C-section 'left him with mental distress'

Home> News

Updated 11:38 15 Sep 2023 GMT+1Published 11:28 15 Sep 2023 GMT+1

Man sues hospital for $1billion claiming watching wife's C-section 'left him with mental distress'

The dad claimed the birth led to him developing a 'psychotic illness'

Dominic Smithers

Dominic Smithers

A dad tried to sue a hospital after staff allowed him to watch his wife's C-section.

Anil Koppula and his wife, from Melbourne, Australia, welcomed their child into the world back in 2018.

But rather than this being the start every family hopes for, Mr Koppula claimed it had a hugely damaging impact on his mental wellbeing and completely destroyed their relationship.

Advert

And he launched a legal case against Royal Women's Hospital, claiming he had developed a 'psychotic illness' from witnessing the birth.

According to court documents, Mr Koppula demanded he receive $1 billion AUD (£519.1 million) in damages from the hospital.

The dad said watching the birth led to him developing a 'psychotic illness.
Sornanison Prekittrakeen/Getty Images

The distressed father said he had been encouraged by staff to watch the delivery, during which he was exposed to his wife's internal organs and blood.

Advert

He told the court that this was a clear breach of the hospital's duty of care.

But while the Royal Women's Hospital admitted it did have a responsibility to provide a duty of care but said it in no way breached it.

Presiding over the bizarre case, justice James Gorton sided with the hospital, ruling that Mr Koppula's lawsuit was a clear 'abuse of process'.

He explained that the law only allows a person to seek damages when there's been no loss of earnings if they have suffered a 'significant injury' - which Mr Koppula had not.

Advert

A psychological examination also found that 'the degree of psychiatric impairment resulting from the injury to the claimant alleged in the claim does not satisfy the threshold level'.

The man lost his lawsuit.
Getty

Justice Gorton said: "I am therefore satisfied that the legal effect of the Medical Panel's determination is that Mr Koppula is simply unable, as a matter of law, to recover damages for non-economic loss."

According to reports, Mr Koppula, who represented himself, decided not to appeal the decision.

Advert

This comes after a mother in New Zealand was left with chronic pain after having a baby via c-section.

The unnamed woman was horrified to discover over a year later that she had a surgical tool the size of a dinner plate left inside her abdomen.

She was left in agonising pain after giving birth in 2020 but despite having multiple check ups the object went unnoticed for 18 months when it was picked up on during an abdominal CT scan.

The object in question was an extra large Alexis wound retractor, or AWR — a device used to draw back the edges of a wound during surgery.

Advert

A newly published report from New Zealand’s health and disability commissioner stated: "The Case Review found that it was this second AWR (size XL) that was retained.

"It should be noted that the retractor, a round, soft tubal instrument of transparent plastic fixed on two rings, is a large item, about the size of a dinner plate.

“Usually, it would be removed after closing the uterine incision (and before the skin is sutured)."

Featured Image Credit: Pramote Polyamate/Sornanison Prekittrakeen/Getty Images

Topics: Parenting, Health, Sex and Relationships

Dominic Smithers
Dominic Smithers

Dominic Smithers is the News/Agenda Desk Lead, covering the latest trends and breaking stories. After graduating from the University of Leeds with a degree in French and History, he went on to write for the Manchester Evening News, the Accrington Observer and the Macclesfield Express. So as you can imagine, he’s spent many a night wondering just how useful that second language has been. But c'est la vie.

X

@SmithersDom

Advert

Advert

Advert

Choose your content:

10 hours ago
12 hours ago
13 hours ago
  • 10 hours ago

    Couple lose an arm each after terrifying tornado ripped through their home

    Paul and Gail Cline from London, Kentucky both sustained a number of injuries as a result of the deadly storm

    News
  • 12 hours ago

    Death row inmate reveals bleak reason why he volunteered to be executed

    South Carolina man James Robertson has been on death row since 1999 after killing both his parents

    News
  • 12 hours ago

    Pro boxer Georgia O’Connor dies of cancer aged 25 two weeks after marrying ‘love of her life’

    Boxer Georgia O’Connor claimed medics 'gaslit' her and dismissed her symptoms

    News
  • 13 hours ago

    Prince Harry just made a major mistake that’s 'stripped him of control' in family 'feud', expert says

    Family dynamics mediator Julie Cobalt believes Harry should have handled something differently

    News
  • Man claiming to be secret son of King Charles and Queen Camilla shared 'proof' that he’s related
  • Hugh Jackman’s ex-wife Deborra revealed why sleeping with him was like ‘always having affairs’
  • Ashley St. Clair finally reveals baby’s name after claiming Elon Musk is the dad
  • People divided after watching new clip of woman forced to watch her boyfriend cheat on her after she cheated on him