tyla homepage
  • News
  • Life
  • TV & Film
  • Beauty
  • Style
  • Home
  • News
    • Celebrity
    • Entertainment
    • Politics
    • Royal Family
  • Life
    • Animals
    • Food & Drink
    • Women's Health
    • Mental Health
    • Sex & Relationships
    • Travel
    • Real Life
  • TV & Film
    • True Crime
    • Documentaries
    • Netflix
    • BBC
    • ITV
    • Tyla Recommends
  • Beauty
    • Hair
    • Make-up
    • Skincare
  • Style
    • Home
    • Fashion
    • Shopping
  • Advertise
  • Terms
  • Privacy & Cookies
  • LADbible Group
  • LADbible
  • UNILAD
  • SPORTbible
  • GAMINGbible
  • UNILAD Tech
  • FOODbible
  • License Our Content
  • About Us & Contact
  • Jobs
  • Latest
  • Topics A-Z
  • Authors
Facebook
Instagram
X
Threads
TikTok
Submit Your Content
Mum fined £69,000 after kids pick up 72 clams on beach which they mistakenly thought were seashells

Home> Life> Money

Published 15:33 24 May 2024 GMT+1

Mum fined £69,000 after kids pick up 72 clams on beach which they mistakenly thought were seashells

The California mother had no idea that her children had broken one of the state's most vital fishing laws

Rhianna Benson

Rhianna Benson

google discoverFollow us on Google Discover

A US mother was left utterly blindsided earlier this year after being dealt a staggering £69,000 bill following a day at the beach with her family.

Apparently, California resident Charlotte Russ made the devastating mistake of neglecting to consider the America's strict rule on fishing licences before she allowed her young children to go on a scavenger hunt for shells - or, at least, what they thought were shells...

What Charlotte's brood had actually been collecting on the fun-fuelled day at the seaside, however, was a batch of 72 rather pricey clams - something the horrified mum was only made aware of after she was handed a hefty $88,000 fine.

Advert

The children had innocently scattered themselves across the sand on the hunt for the most eye-catching shells, later storing them in their mother's truck to be transported home to be transformed into decoration.

The family had no idea, however, that they'd actually broken state regulations by unknowingly collecting shellfish, as opposed to just shells.

As a result, Charlotte found herself in some very hot water indeed - pardon the ocean puns...

The woman was handed a hefty bill after her children collected some clams. (ABC7)
The woman was handed a hefty bill after her children collected some clams. (ABC7)

It turns out that the Russ family were in need of a fishing licence before they began inadvertently collecting the undergrown clams, which - it later transpired - were prohibited from collection even with the right paperwork.

Speaking on the matter on behalf of the Department of Fish and Wildlife, Lieutenant Matthew Gil later explained which rules exactly Charlotte had broken, revealing that the fact that the clams her children selected were not fully grown was the major issue.

"The reason we got it we have these regulations is because we have to let them get to 4 and a half inches," he told ABC7. "So they can have they can have offspring every year. They had juvenile clams."

Gil also went on to emphasise how exactly families - particularly children - can tell the difference between a clam and a shell, revealing that, if you cannot easily take a presumed shell apart, or split it, then it's very probably a clam.

Recalling the predicament she found herself in earlier this year, Charlotte said she was initially terrified.

Charlotte thankfully managed to escape with a $500 bill. (ABC7)
Charlotte thankfully managed to escape with a $500 bill. (ABC7)

"It made me really sad and depressed, and it kind of ruined our trip," she admitted, adding that she's certainly learned her lesson by now.

"They [kids] know now at the beach don't touch anything, but they know now what a clam is, compared to what a seashell is now, I've had to explain that to them."

Thankfully, the Russ family were let off with the colossal fine, having evidently had no idea she or her children had committed a fine.

She did, however, have to pay a one-off sum of $500 for the faff of the matter.

Featured Image Credit: ABC7

Topics: Crime, Money, Parenting, US News, News

Rhianna Benson
Rhianna Benson

Rhianna is an Entertainment Journalist at LADbible Group, working across LADbible, UNILAD and Tyla. She has a Masters in News Journalism from the University of Salford and a Masters in Ancient History from the University of Edinburgh. She previously worked as a Celebrity Reporter for OK! and New Magazines, and as a TV Writer for Reach PLC.

X

@rhiannaBjourno

Advert

Advert

Advert

Choose your content:

11 hours ago
14 hours ago
19 hours ago
a day ago
  • Smith Collection/Gado/Getty Images
    11 hours ago

    Starbucks' Hannah Montana themed drink sparks outrage as fans call out major detail

    Miley Cyrus' character was famously allergic to the berry flavouring in the Disney Channel hit

    Life
  • Instagram/@clavicular0
    14 hours ago

    Doctor issues concerning ‘looksmaxxing’ warning following creators' influence

    Alexander Rivkin, MD, has taken to Instagram to call out Clavicular's social media presence

    Life
  • Ben Montgomery/Getty Images
    19 hours ago

    Warning signs of bowel cancer in men vs women after MAFS Star Mel Schilling dies after diagnosis

    The MAFS star has died aged 54, following a bowel cancer diagnosis in December 2023

    Life
  • NIC COURY/AFP via Getty Images
    a day ago

    Apple CEO gives brutal advice to anyone who doomscrolls

    If you spend many an hour in bed trapped in a cycle of scrolling rather than sleeping, this is for you

    Life
  • Woman ends up in coma after thinking symptoms were caused by her 'noisy' kids
  • 9-year-old girl dies after being left in extremely hot car for six hours while mum was at work
  • Tragic video mum shared online day before killing her husband with brain cancer
  • Mum issues warning after son died from taking herbal supplement with 'opioid-like' effects