tyla homepage
tyla homepage
  • News
    • Politics
    • Entertainment
    • Celebrity
  • Entertainment
    • Celebrity
  • Life
    • Animals
    • Food & Drink
    • Women's Health
    • Mental Health
    • Sex & Relationships
    • Travel
    • Real Life
  • TV & Film
    • True Crime
    • Tyla Recommends
  • Astrology
  • Beauty
    • Hair
    • Make-up
    • Skincare
  • Style
    • Home
  • Advertise
  • Terms
  • Privacy & Cookies
  • LADbible Group
  • LADbible
  • UNILAD
  • SPORTbible
  • GAMINGbible
  • UNILAD Tech
  • FOODbible
  • License Our Content
  • About Us & Contact
  • Jobs
  • Latest
  • Archive
  • Topics A-Z
  • Authors
Facebook
Instagram
X
Threads
TikTok
Submit Your Content
Amber Heard's Lawyer Says She Cannot Pay $10.4 Million Settlement
Home>News
Updated 07:51 3 Jun 2022 GMT+1Published 12:39 2 Jun 2022 GMT+1

Amber Heard's Lawyer Says She Cannot Pay $10.4 Million Settlement

On Wednesday, it was ruled that Depp had won the defamation case against Heard.

Lucy Devine

Lucy Devine

google discoverFollow us on Google Discover
Featured Image Credit: Alamy

Topics: News, Johnny Depp

Lucy Devine
Lucy Devine

Lucy is a journalist working for Tyla. After graduating with a master's degree in journalism, she has worked in both print and online and is particularly interested in fashion, food, health and women's issues. Northerner, coffee addict, says hun a lot.

X

@lucedevine

Advert

Advert

Advert

Amber Heard's lawyer has said she cannot pay the $10.4 million verdict announced on Wednesday (1 June).

Speaking to TODAY's Savannah Guthrie, Elaine Bredehoft explained that Heard cannot pay the damages.

You can watch the clip below:

EXCLUSIVE: @SavannahGuthrie talks to Amber Heard’s attorney, Elaine Charlson Bredhoft, following Johnny Depp's legal win. pic.twitter.com/i1EOlz1NcU

— TODAY (@TODAYshow) June 2, 2022

When asked: "Is she able to pay a $10.4 million judgement?" Ms Bredehoft responded: "Oh no. Absolutely not."

Ms Bredehoft also said that Heard would be appealing, adding that "she has some excellent grounds for it".

Advert

When questioned over what kind of 'message' the verdict sends out, Ms Bredehoft added: "It's a horrible message, it's a set back, a significant set back, because that's exactly what it means.

"Unless you pull out your phone and you video your spouse or your significant other beating you effectively you won't be believed."

The jury announced on Wednesday that Depp had won the defamation case against Heard (
Tyla)

The jury announced on Wednesday that Depp had won the defamation case against Heard.

They found that Heard did defame Depp on all three counts, in her op-ed for the Washington Post back in 2018.

Depp has been awarded $15 million in damages - $10m in compensatory damages and $5m in punitive damages.

However, Judge Penney Azcarate reduced the punitive damages to meet Virginia's statutory cap of $350,000, meaning the total Heard must pay is $10.4 million.

During the verdict, the foreperson of the jury ran through each of the questions, answering 'yes' to each. These included whether Heard 'acted with malice' and whether statements about the marriage were 'false' and whether the op-ed referenced her relationship with Depp.


While the jury ruled that Heard's defamation claims against Depp were not fully proven, they did however award $2 million in compensatory damages to Heard.

Heard was in attendance in the courtroom on Wednesday, while Depp was still in the UK due to prior commitments. He is believed to have been watching the verdict.

Following the decision, Heard released a statement on social media.

It read: "The disappointment I feel today is beyond words. I'm heartbroken that the mountain of evidence still was not enough to stand up to the disproportionate power, influence and sway of my ex-husband.

"I'm even more disappointed with what this verdict means for other women. It is a setback. It sets back the clock to a time when a woman who spoke up and spoke out could be publicly shamed and humiliated. It sets back the idea that violence against women is to be taken seriously.

"I believe Johnny's attorneys succeeded in getting the jury to overlook the key issue of Freedom of Speech and ignore evidence that was so conclusive that we won in the UK.

"I'm sad I lost this case. But I am sadder still that I seem to have lost a right I thought I had as an American - to speak freely and openly."

Choose your content:

2 days ago
  • YouTube/ Kirklees Council Live Streaming
    2 days ago

    Newly-elected Reform councillor makes concerning confession during first meeting

    Sarah Wood raised concerns after objecting to a vote during the chaotic meeting

    News
  • war.gov/UFO
    2 days ago

    The White House releases top secret UFO files and images

    A second batch of files has been released by the government, referring to 'fireballs' and more

    News
  • Chris Jackson/Getty Images
    2 days ago

    Royal ‘objected’ to ‘common’ Kate Middleton marrying Prince William

    Royal author Christopher Andersen has alleged that one member of the royal family was among 'Kate’s fiercest critics'

    News
  • Mustafa Ciftci/Anadolu Agency via Getty Images
    2 days ago

    Warning over when it's too hot to walk your dog as heatwave looms

    The upcoming bank holiday weekend is set to see the hottest day of the year so far in the UK

    News
  • Amber Heard makes rare admission over Johnny Depp trial
  • Amber Heard gives fans surprising update after fleeing US and changing her name
  • Johnny Depp addresses Amber Heard trial as he calls out three people who ‘did him dirty’
  • Johnny Depp's Body Language During Amber Heard's Testimony Is Branded 'Concerning'